Computers and Intractability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
Garey, Johnson, Intractability, cover.jpg
AuthorMichael R. Garey and David S. Johnson
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesA Series of Books in the Mathematical Sciences
SubjectComputer science
GenreTextbook
PublisherW. H. Freeman and Company
Publication date
1979
Media typePrint
Pagesx+338
ISBN0-7167-1045-5
OCLC247570676
519.4
LC ClassQA76.6 .G35

In computer science, more specifically computational complexity theory, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness is an influential textbook by Michael Garey and David S. Johnson.[1] It was the first book exclusively on the theory of NP-completeness and computational intractability.[2] The book features an appendix providing a thorough compendium of NP-complete problems (which was updated in later printings of the book). The book is now outdated in some respects as it does not cover more recent development such as the PCP theorem. It is nevertheless still in print and is regarded as a classic: in a 2006 study, the CiteSeer search engine listed the book as the most cited reference in computer science literature.[3]

Open problems[edit]

Another appendix of the book featured problems for which it was not known whether they were NP-complete or in P (or neither). The problems (with their original names) are:

  1. Graph isomorphism
    This problem is known to be in NP, but it is unknown if it is NP-complete.
  2. Subgraph homeomorphism (for a fixed graph H)
  3. Graph genus
  4. Chordal graph completion
  5. Chromatic index[4]
  6. Spanning tree parity problem[5]
  7. Partial order dimension
  8. Precedence constrained 3-processor scheduling
    This problem was still open as of 2016.[6]
  9. Linear programming
  10. Total unimodularity[7]
  11. Composite number
    Testing for compositeness is known to be in P, but the complexity of the closely related integer factorization problem remains open.
  12. Minimum length triangulation[8]
    Problem 12 is known to be NP-hard, but it is unknown if it is in NP.

Reception[edit]

Soon after it appeared, the book received positive reviews by reputed researchers in the area of theoretical computer science.

In his review, Ronald V. Book recommends the book to "anyone who wishes to learn about the subject of NP-completeness", and he explicitly mentions the "extremely useful" appendix with over 300 NP-hard computational problems. He concludes: "Computer science needs more books like this one."[9]

Harry R. Lewis praises the mathematical prose of the authors: "Garey and Johnson's book is a thorough, clear, and practical exposition of NP-completeness. In many respects it is hard to imagine a better treatment of the subject." Also, he considers the appendix as "unique" and "as a starting point in attempts to show new problems to be NP-complete".[10]

Twenty-three years after the book appeared, Lance Fortnow, editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Transactions on Computational Theory, states: "I consider Garey and Johnson the single most important book on my office bookshelf. Every computer scientist should have this book on their shelves as well. [...] Garey and Johnson has the best introduction to computational complexity I have ever seen." [11]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Garey, M. R.; Johnson, D. S. (1979). Victor Klee, ed. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. A Series of Books in the Mathematical Sciences. San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman and Co. pp. x+338. ISBN 0-7167-1045-5. MR 0519066.
  2. ^ Juris Hartmanis (1982). "Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, book review". SIAM Review. 24 (1): 90–91. doi:10.1137/1024022. JSTOR 2029450.
  3. ^ "Most cited articles in Computer Science - September 2006 (CiteSeer.Continuity)". Retrieved 2007-11-03.
  4. ^ NP-complete: Holyer, Ian (November 1981). "The NP-Completeness of Edge-Coloring". SIAM Journal on Computing. 10 (4): 718–720. doi:10.1137/0210055.
  5. ^ In P: Lovász, L. Lovász, L.; Sós, V.T., eds. Algebraic Methods in Graph Theory, Volume II (Colloquium Szeged, 1978). Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, 25. North-Holland. pp. 495–517.
  6. ^ van Bevern, René; Bredereck, Robert; Bulteau, Laurent; Komusiewicz, Christian; Talmon, Nimrod; Woeginger, Gerhard J. (2016). "Precedence-Constrained Scheduling Problems Parameterized by Partial Order Width". DOOR 2016: Discrete Optimization and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 9869. Springer-Verlag. pp. 105–120. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44914-2_9.
  7. ^ In P: Seymour, P. D. (June 1980). "Decomposition of regular matroids". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. 28 (3): 305–359. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(80)90075-1.
  8. ^ Is NP-hard: Mulzer, Wolfgang; Rote, Günter (2008), "Minimum-weight triangulation is NP-hard", Journal of the ACM, 55 (2), Art. 11, arXiv:cs.CG/0601002, doi:10.1145/1346330.1346336, MR 2417038
  9. ^ Ronald V. Book. Review: Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 3(2), pp. 898–904, 1980
  10. ^ Harry R. Lewis, Review: Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 48(2), pp. 498–500, 1983
  11. ^ Lance Fortnow, Great Books: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness by Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computational complexity blog, August 30, 2002.