Semiotic anthropology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The phrase "semiotic anthropology" was first used by Milton Singer (1978). Singer's work brought together the semiotics of Charles Sanders Peirce and Roman Jakobson with theoretical streams that had long been flowing in and around the University of Chicago, where Singer taught.[further explanation needed] In the late 1970s, Michael Silverstein, a young student of Jakobson's at Harvard University, joined Singer in Chicago's Department of Anthropology. Since that time, anthropological work inspired by Peirce's semiotic have proliferated, in part as students of Singer and Silverstein have spread out across the country, developing semiotic-anthropological agendas of their own.

Semiotic anthropology has its precursor in Malinowski's contextualism (which may be called anthropological semantics), which was later resumed by John Rupert Firth.[1] Anthropological approaches to semantics are alternative to the three major types of semantics approaches: linguistic semantics, logical semantics, and general semantics.[1] Other independent approaches to semantics are philosophical semantics and psychological semantics.[1] Elizabeth Mertz has recently reviewed the burgeoning literature in semiotic anthropology (2007). Robert Boroch in article Rethinking Milton Singer’s semiotic anthropology: A reconnaissance (2018: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0119) proposed the extension of semiotics anthropological about the theory of semiotics culture by Yuri Łotmana.


See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Winfried Nöth (1995) Handbook of semiotics p.103

References[edit]

  • Singer, M. B. (1978). "For a Semiotic Anthropology," in Sight, Sound and Sense. Edited by T. Sebeok, pp. 202–231. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Mertz, Elizabeth (2007). "Semiotic Anthropology". Annual Review of Anthropology. 36 (1): 337–353. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094417.
  • Boroch, R. (2018). Rethinking Milton Singer’s semiotic anthropology: A reconnaissance . Semiotica, 2018(224), pp. 211-222, doi:10.1515/sem-2016-0119

Further reading[edit]