Tetration

Not to be confused with titration.

Domain coloring of the holomorphic tetration ${}^{z}e$, with hue representing the function argument and brightness representing magnitude

${}^{n}x$, for n = 1, 2, 3 ..., showing convergence to the infinitely iterated exponential between the two dots

In mathematics, tetration (or hyper-4) is the next hyperoperation after exponentiation, but before pentation and is as such defined as iterated exponentiation. The word was coined by Reuben Louis Goodstein from tetra- (four) and iteration. Tetration is used for the notation of very large numbers. The notation ${^{n}a}$ means ${a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a}}}}}$, which is the application of exponentiation $n-1$ times.

The first four hyperoperations are shown here, with tetration being the fourth of these (in this case, the unary operation succession, $a'=a+1$, is considered to be the zeroth operation).

1. Addition

   $a+n=a+\underbrace {1+1+\cdots +1} _{n}$

   n copies of 1 added to a.

2. Multiplication

   $a\times n=\underbrace {a+a+\cdots +a} _{n}$

   n copies of a combined by addition.

3. Exponentiation

   $a^{n}=\underbrace {a\times a\times \cdots \times a} _{n}$

   n copies of a combined by multiplication.

4. Tetration

   ${^{n}a}=\underbrace {a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a}}}}} _{n}$

   n copies of a combined by exponentiation, right-to-left.

Here, succession (a' = a + 1) is the most basic operation; addition (a + n) is a primary operation, though for natural numbers it can be thought of as a chained succession of n successors of a; multiplication ($a\times n$) is also a primary operation, though for natural numbers it can be thought of as a chained addition involving n numbers a. Exponentiation ($a^{n}$) can be thought of as a chained multiplication involving n numbers a, and analogously, tetration ($^{n}a$) can be thought of as a chained power involving n numbers a. Each of the operations above are defined by iterating the previous one; however, unlike the operations before it, tetration is not an elementary function.

The parameter a may be called the base-parameter in the following, while the parameter n in the following may be called the height-parameter (which is integral in the first approach but may be generalized to fractional, real and complex heights, see below). Tetration is read as "the nth tetration of a"

Formal definition

For any positive real $a>0$ and non-negative integer $n\geq 0$, we can define $\,\!{^{n}a}$ recursively as:

${^{n}a}:={\begin{cases}1&{\text{if }}n=0\\a^{\left(^{(n-1)}a\right)}&{\text{if }}n>0\end{cases}}$

This formal definition is equivalent to repeated exponentiation for natural heights; however, this definition allows for extensions to other heights such as $^{0}a$, $^{-1}a$, and $^{i}a$.

Terminology

There are many terms for tetration, each of which has some logic behind it, but some have not become commonly used for one reason or another. Here is a comparison of each term with its rationale and counter-rationale.

• The term tetration, introduced by Goodstein in his 1947 paper Transfinite Ordinals in Recursive Number Theory (generalizing the recursive base-representation used in Goodstein's theorem to use higher operations), has gained dominance. It was also popularized in Rudy Rucker's Infinity and the Mind.
• The term superexponentiation was published by Bromer in his paper Superexponentiation in 1987. It was used earlier by Ed Nelson in his book Predicative Arithmetic, Princeton University Press, 1986.
• The term hyperpower is a natural combination of hyper and power, which aptly describes tetration. The problem lies in the meaning of hyper with respect to the hyperoperation sequence. When considering hyperoperations, the term hyper refers to all ranks, and the term super refers to rank 4, or tetration. So under these considerations hyperpower is misleading, since it is only referring to tetration.
• The term power tower is occasionally used, in the form "the power tower of order n" for ${\ \atop {\ }}{{\underbrace {a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a}}}}} } \atop n}$. This is a misnomer, however, because tetration cannot be expressed with iterated power functions (see above), since it is an iterated exponential function.
• The term snap is occasionally used in informal contexts, in the form "a snap n" for ${\ \atop {\ }}{{\underbrace {a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a}}}}} } \atop n}$. This term is not yet widely accepted, although it is used within select communities. It is believed to be a reference to jounce, the fourth derivative of position in physics, as tetration is the fourth hyperoperation and jounce is also known as snap.

Owing in part to some shared terminology and similar notational symbolism, tetration is often confused with closely related functions and expressions. Here are a few related terms:

Form	Terminology
$a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a^{a}}}}}$	Tetration
$a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a^{x}}}}}$	Iterated exponentials
$a_{1}^{a_{2}^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a_{n}}}}}$	Nested exponentials (also towers)
$a_{1}^{a_{2}^{a_{3}^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}$	Infinite exponentials (also towers)

In the first two expressions a is the base, and the number of times a appears is the height (add one for x). In the third expression, n is the height, but each of the bases is different.

Care must be taken when referring to iterated exponentials, as it is common to call expressions of this form iterated exponentiation, which is ambiguous, as this can either mean iterated powers or iterated exponentials.

Notation

There are many different notation styles that can be used to express tetration. Some notations can also be used to describe other hyperoperations, while some are limited to tetration and have no immediate extension.

Name	Form	Description
Rudy Rucker notation	$\,{}^{n}a$	Used by Maurer [1901] and Goodstein [1947]; Rudy Rucker's book Infinity and the Mind popularized the notation.
Knuth's up-arrow notation	$a{\uparrow \uparrow }n$	Allows extension by putting more arrows, or, even more powerfully, an indexed arrow.
Conway chained arrow notation	$a\rightarrow n\rightarrow 2$	Allows extension by increasing the number 2 (equivalent with the extensions above), but also, even more powerfully, by extending the chain
Ackermann function	${}^{n}2=\operatorname {A} (4,n-3)+3$	Allows the special case $a=2$ to be written in terms of the Ackermann function.
Iterated exponential notation	$\exp _{a}^{n}(1)$	Allows simple extension to iterated exponentials from initial values other than 1.
Hooshmand notations	$\operatorname {uxp} _{a}n$ $a^{\frac {n}{}}$	Used by M. H. Hooshmand [2006].
Hyperoperation notations	$a[4]n$ $H_{4}(a,n)$	Allows extension by increasing the number 4; this gives the family of hyperoperations.
Double caret notation	a^^n	Since the up-arrow is used identically to the caret (^), tetration may be written as (^^); convenient for ASCII.
Bowers's operators	{a,b,4} {a,b,4,1} a {4} b	Similar to the hyperoperation notations.

One notation above uses iterated exponential notation; in general this is defined as follows:

$\exp _{a}^{n}(x)=a^{a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a^{x}}}}}$ with n "a"s.

There are not as many notations for iterated exponentials, but here are a few:

Name	Form	Description
Standard notation	$\exp _{a}^{n}(x)$	Euler coined the notation $\exp _{a}(x)=a^{x}$, and iteration notation $f^{n}(x)$ has been around about as long.
Knuth's up-arrow notation	$(a{\uparrow })^{n}(x)$	Allows for super-powers and super-exponential function by increasing the number of arrows; used in the article on large numbers.
Text notation	exp_a^n(x)	Based on standard notation; convenient for ASCII.
J Notation	x^^:(n-1)x	Repeats the exponentiation. See J (programming language)

Examples

Because of the extremely fast growth of tetration, most values in the following table are too large to write in scientific notation. In these cases, iterated exponential notation is used to express them in base 10. The values containing a decimal point are approximate.

$x$	${}^{2}x$	${}^{3}x$	${}^{4}x$	${}^{5}x$
1	1	1	1	1
2	4	16	65,536	265,536 or (2.00353 × 1019,728)
3	27	7,625,597,484,987	$\exp _{10}^{3}(1.09902)$ (3.6 × 1012 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(1.09902)$
4	256	1.34078 × 10154	$\exp _{10}^{3}(2.18726)$ (8.1 × 10153 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(2.18726)$
5	3,125	1.91101 × 102,184	$\exp _{10}^{3}(3.33928)$ (1.3 × 102,184 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(3.33928)$
6	46,656	2.65912 × 1036,305	$\exp _{10}^{3}(4.55997)$ (2.1 × 1036,305 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(4.55997)$
7	823,543	3.75982 × 10695,974	$\exp _{10}^{3}(5.84259)$ (3.2 × 10695,974 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(5.84259)$
8	16,777,216	6.01452 × 1015,151,335	$\exp _{10}^{3}(7.18045)$ (5.4 × 1015,151,335 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(7.18045)$
9	387,420,489	4.28125 × 10369,693,099	$\exp _{10}^{3}(8.56784)$ (4.1 × 10369,693,099 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(8.56784)$
10	10,000,000,000	1010,000,000,000	$\exp _{10}^{3}(10)$ (1010,000,000,000 digits)	$\exp _{10}^{4}(10)$

Properties

Tetration has several properties that are similar to exponentiation, as well as properties that are specific to the operation and are lost or gained from exponentiation. Because exponentiation does not commute, the product and power rules do not have an analogue with tetration; the statements ${\textstyle {}^{a}\left({}^{b}x\right)=\left({}^{ab}x\right)}$ and ${\textstyle {}^{a}\left(xy\right)={}^{a}x{}^{a}y}$ are not necessarily true for all cases.

However, tetration does follow a different property, in which ${\textstyle {}^{a}x=x^{\left({}^{a-1}x\right)}}$. This fact is most clearly shown using the recursive definition. From this property, a proof follows that $\left({}^{b}a\right)^{\left({}^{c}a\right)}=\left({}^{c+1}a\right)^{\left({}^{b-1}a\right)}$, which allows for switching b and c in certain equations. The proof goes as follows:

${\begin{aligned}&\left({}^{b}a\right)^{\left({}^{c}a\right)}\\={}&\left(a^{{}^{b-1}a}\right)^{\left({}^{c}a\right)}\\={}&a^{\left({}^{b-1}a\right)\left({}^{c}a\right)}\\={}&a^{\left({}^{c}a\right)\left({}^{b-1}a\right)}\\={}&\left({}^{c+1}a\right)^{\left({}^{b-1}a\right)}\end{aligned}}$

When a number x and 10 are coprime, it is possible to compute the last m decimal digits of $\,\!\ ^{a}x$ using Euler's theorem, for any integer m.

Direction of evaluation

When evaluating tetration expressed as an "exponentiation tower", the exponentiation is done at the deepest level first (in the notation, at the apex). For example:

$\,\!\ ^{4}2=2^{2^{2^{2}}}=2^{\left(2^{\left(2^{2}\right)}\right)}=2^{\left(2^{4}\right)}=2^{16}=65,\!536$

This order is important because exponentiation is not associative, and evaluating the expression in the opposite order will lead to a different answer:

$\,\!2^{2^{2^{2}}}\neq \left({\left(2^{2}\right)}^{2}\right)^{2}=4^{2\cdot 2}=256$

Evaluating the expression the left to right is considered less interesting; evaluating left to right, any expression $^{n}a$ can be simplified to be $a^{\left(a^{n-1}\right)}$. Because of this, the towers must be evaluated from right to left (or top to bottom). Computer programmers refer to this choice as right-associative.

Extensions

Tetration can be extended in two different ways; in the equation $^{n}a$, both the base a and the height n can be generalized using the definition and properties of tetration. Although the base and the height can be extended beyond the positive integers to different domains, including ${^{n}0}$, complex functions such as ${}^{n}i$, and heights of infinite $n$, the more limited properties of tetration reduce the ability to extend tetration.

Extension of domain for bases

Base zero

The exponential $0^{0}$ is not consistently defined. Thus, the tetrations $\,{^{n}0}$ are not clearly defined by the formula given earlier. However, $\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}{}^{n}x$ is well defined, and exists:

$\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}{}^{n}x={\begin{cases}1,&n{\text{ even}}\\0,&n{\text{ odd}}\end{cases}}$

Thus we could consistently define ${}^{n}0=\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}{}^{n}x$. This is equivalent to defining $0^{0}=1$.

Under this extension, ${}^{0}0=1$, so the rule ${^{0}a}=1$ from the original definition still holds.

Complex bases

Tetration by period

Tetration by escape

Since complex numbers can be raised to powers, tetration can be applied to bases of the form z = a + bi (where a and b are real). For example, in ⁿz with z = i, tetration is achieved by using the principal branch of the natural logarithm; using Euler's formula we get the relation:

$i^{a+bi}=e^{{\frac {1}{2}}{\pi i}(a+bi)}=e^{-{\frac {1}{2}}{\pi b}}\left(\cos {\frac {\pi a}{2}}+i\sin {\frac {\pi a}{2}}\right)$

This suggests a recursive definition for ⁿ⁺¹i = a' + b'i given any ⁿi = a + bi:

${\begin{aligned}a'&=e^{-{\frac {1}{2}}{\pi b}}\cos {\frac {\pi a}{2}}\\b'&=e^{-{\frac {1}{2}}{\pi b}}\sin {\frac {\pi a}{2}}\end{aligned}}$

The following approximate values can be derived:

${\textstyle {}^{n}i}$	Approximate value
${\textstyle {}^{1}i=i}$	i
${\textstyle {}^{2}i=i^{\left({}^{1}i\right)}}$	0.2079
${\textstyle {}^{3}i=i^{\left({}^{2}i\right)}}$	0.9472 + 0.3208i
${\textstyle {}^{4}i=i^{\left({}^{3}i\right)}}$	0.0501 + 0.6021i
${\textstyle {}^{5}i=i^{\left({}^{4}i\right)}}$	0.3872 + 0.0305i
${\textstyle {}^{6}i=i^{\left({}^{5}i\right)}}$	0.7823 + 0.5446i
${\textstyle {}^{7}i=i^{\left({}^{6}i\right)}}$	0.1426 + 0.4005i
${\textstyle {}^{8}i=i^{\left({}^{7}i\right)}}$	0.5198 + 0.1184i
${\textstyle {}^{9}i=i^{\left({}^{8}i\right)}}$	0.5686 + 0.6051i

Solving the inverse relation, as in the previous section, yields the expected ⁰i = 1 and ⁻¹i = 0, with negative values of n giving infinite results on the imaginary axis. Plotted in the complex plane, the entire sequence spirals to the limit 0.4383 + 0.3606i, which could be interpreted as the value where n is infinite.

Such tetration sequences have been studied since the time of Euler, but are poorly understood due to their chaotic behavior. Most published research historically has focused on the convergence of the infinitely iterated exponential function. Current research has greatly benefited by the advent of powerful computers with fractal and symbolic mathematics software. Much of what is known about tetration comes from general knowledge of complex dynamics and specific research of the exponential map.

Extensions of the domain for different "heights"

Infinite heights

$\textstyle \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }{}^{n}x$ of the infinitely iterated exponential converges for the bases $\textstyle \left(e^{-1}\right)^{e}\leq x\leq e^{e^{-1}})$

The function $\left|{\frac {\mathrm {W} (-\ln {z})}{-\ln {z}}}\right|$ on the complex plane, showing the real-valued infinitely iterated exponential function (black curve)

Tetration can be extended to infinite heights; i.e., for certain a and n values in ${}^{n}a$, there exists a well defined result for an infinite n. This is because for bases within a certain interval, tetration converges to a finite value as the height tends to infinity. For example, ${\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}$ converges to 2, and can therefore be said to be equal to 2. The trend towards 2 can be seen by evaluating a small finite tower:

${\begin{aligned}{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{1.414}}}}}&\approx {\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{1.63}}}}\\&\approx {\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{1.76}}}\\&\approx {\sqrt {2}}^{{\sqrt {2}}^{1.84}}\\&\approx {\sqrt {2}}^{1.89}\\&\approx 1.93\end{aligned}}$

In general, the infinitely iterated exponential $x^{x^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}$, defined as the limit of ${}^{n}x$ as n goes to infinity, converges for e^−e ≤ x ≤ e^1/e, roughly the interval from 0.066 to 1.44, a result shown by Leonhard Euler. The limit, should it exist, is a positive real solution of the equation y = x^y. Thus, x = y^1/y. The limit defining the infinite tetration of x fails to converge for x > e^1/e because the maximum of y^1/y is e^1/e.

This may be extended to complex numbers z with the definition:

${}^{\infty }z=z^{z^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}={\frac {\mathrm {W} (-\ln {z})}{-\ln {z}}}~,$

where W represents Lambert's W function.

As the limit y = ^∞x (if existent, i.e. for e^−e < x < e^1/e) must satisfy x^y = y we see that x ↦ y = ^∞x is (the lower branch of) the inverse function of y ↦ x = y^1/y.

Negative heights

We can use the recursive rule for tetration,

${^{k+1}a}=a^{\left({^{k}a}\right)},$

to prove ${}^{-1}a$:

$^{k}a=\log _{a}\left(^{k+1}a\right);$

Substituting −1 for k gives

${}^{-1}a=\log _{a}\left({}^{0}a\right)=\log _{a}1=0$.

Smaller negative values cannot be well defined in this way. Substituting −2 for k in the same equation gives

${}^{-2}a=\log _{a}\left({}^{-1}a\right)=\log _{a}0$

which is not well defined. They can, however, sometimes be considered sets.

For $n=1$, any definition of $\,\!{^{-1}1}$ is consistent with the rule because

${^{0}1}=1=1^{n}$ for any $\,\!n={^{-1}1}$.

Real heights

At this time there is no commonly accepted solution to the general problem of extending tetration to the real or complex values of $n$. There have, however, been multiple approaches towards the issue, and different approaches are outlined below.

In general the problem is finding, for any real a > 0, a super-exponential function $\,f(x)={}^{x}a$ over real x > −2 that satisfies

• $\,{}^{-1}a=0$
• $\,{}^{0}a=1$
• $\,{}^{x}a=a^{\left({}^{x-1}a\right)}$for all real $x>-1.$

To find a more natural extension, one or more extra requirements are usually required. This is usually some collection of the following:

• A continuity requirement (usually just that ${}^{x}a$ is continuous in both variables for $x>0$).
• A differentiability requirement (can be once, twice, k times, or infinitely differentiable in x).
• A regularity requirement (implying twice differentiable in x) that:

$\left({\frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}}}f(x)>0\right)$ for all $x>0$

The fourth requirement differs from author to author, and between approaches. There are two main approaches to extending tetration to real heights; one is based on the regularity requirement, and one is based on the differentiability requirement. These two approaches seem to be so different that they may not be reconciled, as they produce results inconsistent with each other.

When $\,{}^{x}a$ is defined for an interval of length one, the whole function easily follows for all x > −2.

Linear approximation for real heights

$\,{}^{x}e$ using linear approximation.

A linear approximation (solution to the continuity requirement, approximation to the differentiability requirement) is given by:

${}^{x}a\approx {\begin{cases}\log _{a}\left(^{x+1}a\right)&x\leq -1\\1+x&-1<x\leq 0\\a^{\left(^{x-1}a\right)}&0<x\end{cases}}$

hence:

Approximation	Domain
${\textstyle {}^{x}a\approx x+1}$	for −1 < x < 0
${\textstyle {}^{x}a\approx a^{x}}$	for 0 < x < 1
${\textstyle {}^{x}a\approx a^{a^{(x-1)}}}$	for 1 < x < 2

and so on. However, it is only piecewise differentiable; at integer values of x the derivative is multiplied by $\ln {a}$. It is continuously differentiable for $x>-2$ if and only if $a=e$. For example, using these methods ${}^{\frac {\pi }{2}}e\approx 5.868...$ and ${}^{-4.3}0.5\approx 4.03335...$

A main theorem in Hooshmand's paper states: Let $0<a\neq 1$. If $f:(-2,+\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}$ is continuous and satisfies the conditions:

• $f(x)=a^{f(x-1)}\;\;{\text{for all}}\;\;x>-1,\;f(0)=1,$
• $f$ is differentiable on $(-1,0),$
• $f^{\prime }$ is a nondecreasing or nonincreasing function on $(-1,0),$
• $f^{\prime }\left(0^{+}\right)=(\ln a)f^{\prime }\left(0^{-}\right){\text{ or }}f^{\prime }\left(-1^{+}\right)=f^{\prime }\left(0^{-}\right).$

then $f$ is uniquely determined through the equation

$f(x)=\exp _{a}^{[x]}\left(a^{(x)}\right)=\exp _{a}^{[x+1]}((x))\quad {\text{for all}}\;\;x>-2,$

where $(x)=x-[x]$ denotes the fractional part of x and $\exp _{a}^{[x]}$ is the $[x]$-iterated function of the function $\exp _{a}$.

The proof is that the second through fourth conditions trivially imply that f is a linear function on [−1, 0].

The linear approximation to natural tetration function ${}^{x}e$ is continuously differentiable, but its second derivative does not exist at integer values of its argument. Hooshmand derived another uniqueness theorem for it which states:

If $f:(-2,+\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}$ is a continuous function that satisfies:

• $f(x)=e^{f(x-1)}\;\;{\text{for all}}\;\;x>-1,\;f(0)=1,$
• $f$ is convex on $(-1,0),$
• $f^{\prime }\left(0^{-}\right)\leq f^{\prime }\left(0^{+}\right).$

then $f={\text{uxp}}$. [Here $f={\text{uxp}}$ is Hooshmand's name for the linear approximation to the natural tetration function.]

The proof is much the same as before; the recursion equation ensures that $f^{\prime }(-1^{+})=f^{\prime }(0^{+}),$ and then the convexity condition implies that $f$ is linear on (−1, 0).

Therefore, the linear approximation to natural tetration is the only solution of the equation $f(x)=e^{f(x-1)}\;\;(x>-1)$ and $f(0)=1$ which is convex on $(-1,+\infty )$. All other sufficiently-differentiable solutions must have an inflection point on the interval (−1, 0).

Higher order approximations for real heights

a comparison of the linear and quadratic approximations (in red and blue respectively) of the function $^{x}0.5$, from x = -2 to x = 2.

Beyond linear approximations, a quadratic approximation (to the differentiability requirement) is given by:

${}^{x}a\approx {\begin{cases}\log _{a}\left({}^{x+1}a\right)&x\leq -1\\1+{\frac {2\ln(a)}{1\;+\;\ln(a)}}x-{\frac {1\;-\;\ln(a)}{1\;+\;\ln(a)}}x^{2}&-1<x\leq 0\\a^{\left({}^{x-1}a\right)}&0<x\end{cases}}$

which is differentiable for all $x>0$, but not twice differentiable. For example, ${}^{\frac {1}{2}}2\approx 1.45933...$ If $a=e$ this is the same as the linear approximation. Note that because of the way it is calculated, this function does not "cancel out", contrary to exponents, where $\left(a^{\frac {1}{n}}\right)^{n}=a$. Namely,

${}^{n}\left({}^{\frac {1}{n}}a\right)=\underbrace {\left({}^{\frac {1}{n}}a\right)^{\left({}^{\frac {1}{n}}a\right)^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\left({}^{\frac {1}{n}}a\right)}}}}}}} _{n}\neq a$.

Just as there is a quadratic approximation, cubic approximations and methods for generalizing to approximations of degree n also exist, although they are much more unwieldy.

Complex heights

Drawing of the analytic extension $f=F(x+{\rm {i}}y)$ of tetration to the complex plane. Levels $|f|=1,e^{\pm 1},e^{\pm 2},\ldots$ and levels $\arg(f)=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\ldots$ are shown with thick curves.

It has now been proven that there exists a unique function F which is a solution of the equation F(z + 1) = exp(F(z)) and satisfies the additional conditions that F(0) = 1 and F(z) approaches the fixed points of the logarithm (roughly 0.318 ± 1.337i) as z approaches ±i∞ and that F is holomorphic in the whole complex z-plane, except the part of the real axis at z ≤ −2. This proof confirms a previous conjecture. The complex map of this function is shown in the figure at right. The proof also works for other bases besides e, as long as the base is bigger than $e^{\frac {1}{e}}$. The complex double precision approximation of this function is available online.

The requirement of the tetration being holomorphic is important for its uniqueness. Many functions $S$ can be constructed as

$S(z)=F\!\left(~z~+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\sin(2\pi nz)~\alpha _{n}+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\Big (}1-\cos(2\pi nz){\Big )}~\beta _{n}\right)$

where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are real sequences which decay fast enough to provide the convergence of the series, at least at moderate values of $\Im (z)$.

The function S satisfies the tetration equations S(z + 1) = exp(S(z)), S(0) = 1, and if α_n and β_n approach 0 fast enough it will be analytic on a neighborhood of the positive real axis. However, if some elements of {α} or {β} are not zero, then function S has multitudes of additional singularities and cutlines in the complex plane, due to the exponential growth of sin and cos along the imaginary axis; the smaller the coefficients {α} and {β} are, the further away these singularities are from the real axis.

The extension of tetration into the complex plane is thus essential for the uniqueness; the real-analytic tetration is not unique.

Non-elementary recursiveness

Tetration (restricted to $\mathbb {N} ^{2}$) is not an elementary recursive function. One can prove by induction that for every elementary recursive function f, there is a constant c such that

$f(x)\leq \underbrace {2^{2^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{x}}}}} _{c}.$

We denote the right hand side by $g(c,x)$. Suppose on the contrary that tetration is elementary recursive. $g(x,x)+1$ is also elementary recursive. By the above inequality, there is a constant c such that $g(x,x)+1\leq g(c,x)$. By letting $x=c$, we have that $g(c,c)+1\leq g(c,c)$, a contradiction.

Inverse operations

Exponentiation has two inverse operations; roots and logarithms. Analogously, the inverses of tetration are often called the super-root, and the super-logarithm (In fact, all hyperoperations greater than or equal to 3 have analogous inverses); e.g., in the function ${^{3}}y=x$, the two inverses are the cube super-root of y and the super logarithm base y of x.

Super-root

"Super-root" redirects here. For the directory supported by some Unixes, see super-root (computing).

The super-root is the inverse operation of tetration with respect to the base: if $^{n}y=x$, then y is an nth super root of x (${\sqrt[{n}]{x}}_{s}$ or ${\sqrt[{n}]{x}}_{4}$).

For example,

$^{4}2=2^{2^{2^{2}}}=65,536$

so 2 is the 4th super-root of 65,536.

Square super-root

The graph y = ${\sqrt {x}}_{s}$.

The 2nd-order super-root, square super-root, or super square root has two equivalent notations, $\mathrm {ssrt} (x)$ and ${\sqrt {x}}_{s}$. It is the inverse of $^{2}x=x^{x}$ and can be represented with the Lambert W function:

$\mathrm {ssrt} (x)=e^{W(\mathrm {ln} (x))}={\frac {\mathrm {ln} (x)}{W(\mathrm {ln} (x))}}$

The function also illustrates the reflective nature of the root and logarithm functions as the equation below only holds true when $y=\mathrm {ssrt} (x)$:

${\sqrt[{y}]{x}}=\log _{y}x$

Like square roots, the square super-root of x may not have a single solution. Unlike square roots, determining the number of square super-roots of x may be difficult. In general, if $e^{-1/e}<x<1$, then x has two positive square super-roots between 0 and 1; and if $x>1$, then x has one positive square super-root greater than 1. If x is positive and less than $e^{-1/e}$ it doesn't have any real square super-roots, but the formula given above yields countably infinitely many complex ones for any finite x not equal to 1. The function has been used to determine the size of data clusters.

Other super-roots

The graph $y={\sqrt[{3}]{x}}_{s}$.

For each integer n > 2, the function ⁿx is defined and increasing for x ≥ 1, and ⁿ1 = 1, so that the nth super-root of x, ${\sqrt[{n}]{x}}_{s}$, exists for x ≥ 1.

However, if the linear approximation above is used, then $^{y}x=y+1$ if −1 < y ≤ 0, so $^{y}{\sqrt {y+1}}_{s}$ cannot exist.

In the same way as the square super-root, terminology for other super roots can be based on the normal roots: "cube super-roots" can be expressed as ${\sqrt[{3}]{x}}_{s}$; the "4th super-root" can be expressed as ${\sqrt[{4}]{x}}_{s}$; and the "n^th super-root" is ${\sqrt[{n}]{x}}_{s}$. Note that ${\sqrt[{n}]{x}}_{s}$ may not be uniquely defined, because there may be more than one n^th root. For example, x has a single (real) super-root if n is odd, and up to two if n is even.

Just as with the extension of tetration to infinite heights, the super-root can be extended to $n=\infty$, being well-defined if 1/e ≤ x ≤ e. Note that $x={^{\infty }y}=y^{\left[^{\infty }y\right]}=y^{x},$ and thus that $y=x^{1/x}$. Therefore, when it is well defined, ${\sqrt[{\infty }]{x}}_{s}=x^{1/x}$ and, unlike normal tetration, is an elementary function. For example, ${\sqrt[{\infty }]{2}}_{s}=2^{1/2}={\sqrt {2}}$.

It follows from the Gelfond–Schneider theorem that super-root ${\sqrt {n}}_{s}$ for any positive integer n is either integer or transcendental, and ${\sqrt[{3}]{n}}_{s}$ is either integer or irrational. It is still an open question whether irrational super-roots are transcendental in the latter case.

Super-logarithm

Main article: Super-logarithm

Once a continuous increasing (in x) definition of tetration, ^xa, is selected, the corresponding super-logarithm ${\text{slog}}_{a}x$ or ${\text{log}}_{a}^{4}x$ is defined for all real numbers x, and a > 1.

The function slog_a x satisfies:

${\begin{array}{lcl}\operatorname {slog} _{a}{^{x}a}&=&x\\\operatorname {slog} _{a}a^{x}&=&1+\operatorname {slog} _{a}x\\\operatorname {slog} _{a}x&=&1+\operatorname {slog} _{a}\log _{a}x\\\operatorname {slog} _{a}x&>&-2\end{array}}$

Open questions

Other than the problems with the extensions of tetration, there are several open questions concerning tetration, particularly when concerning the relations between number systems such as integers and irrational numbers

• It is not known whether there is a positive integer n for which ⁿπ or ⁿe is an integer. In particular, it is not known whether ⁴π is an integer, though as π is a transcendental number, it is extremely unlikely.
• It is not known whether ⁿq is an integer for any positive integer n and positive non-integer rational q. Particularly, it is not known whether the positive root of the equation ⁴x = 2 is a rational number. While we know that ²q is transcendental and ³q is irrational for non-integer rational q, it follows that from above, ⁿq is extremely unlikely to be an integer.

See also

• Ackermann function
• Big O notation
• Double exponential function
• Hyperoperation
• Iterated logarithm
• Symmetric level-index arithmetic

References

• Daniel Geisler, tetration.org
• Ioannis Galidakis, On extending hyper4 to nonintegers (undated, 2006 or earlier) (A simpler, easier to read review of the next reference)
• Ioannis Galidakis, On Extending hyper4 and Knuth's Up-arrow Notation to the Reals (undated, 2006 or earlier).
• Robert Munafo, Extension of the hyper4 function to reals (An informal discussion about extending tetration to the real numbers.)
• Lode Vandevenne, Tetration of the Square Root of Two, (2004). (Attempt to extend tetration to real numbers.)
• Ioannis Galidakis, Mathematics, (Definitive list of references to tetration research. Lots of information on the Lambert W function, Riemann surfaces, and analytic continuation.)
• Galidakis, Ioannis and Weisstein, Eric W. Power Tower
• Joseph MacDonell, Some Critical Points of the Hyperpower Function.
• Dave L. Renfro, Web pages for infinitely iterated exponentials
• Knobel R (1981). "Exponentials Reiterated". American Mathematical Monthly. 88: 235–252.
• Hans Maurer, "Über die Funktion $y=x^{[x^{[x(\cdots )]}]}$ für ganzzahliges Argument (Abundanzen)." Mittheilungen der Mathematische Gesellschaft in Hamburg 4, (1901), p. 33–50. (Reference to usage of $\ {^{n}a}$ from Knobel's paper.)

• The Fourth Operation