# Perfect set property

In descriptive set theory, a subset of a Polish space has the **perfect set property** if it is either countable or has a nonempty perfect subset (Kechris 1995, p. 150). Having the perfect set property is not the same property of a subset as being a perfect set.

As nonempty perfect sets in a Polish space always have the cardinality of the continuum, a set with the perfect set property cannot be a counterexample to the continuum hypothesis, stated in the form that every uncountable set of reals has the cardinality of the continuum.

The **Cantor–Bendixson theorem** states that closed sets of a Polish space *X* have the perfect set property in a particularly strong form; any closed set *C* may be written uniquely as the disjoint union of a perfect set *P* and a countable set *S*. Thus it follows that every closed subset of a Polish space has the perfect set property. In particular, every uncountable Polish space has the perfect set property, and can be written as the disjoint union of a perfect set and a countable open set.

The axiom of choice implies the existence of sets of reals that do not have the perfect set property, such as Bernstein sets. However, in Solovay's model, which satisfies all axioms of ZF but not the axiom of choice, every set of reals has the perfect set property, so the use of the axiom of choice is necessary. Every analytic set has the perfect set property. It follows from the existence of sufficiently large cardinals that every projective set has the perfect set property.

## References[edit]

- Kechris, A. S. (1995),
*Classical Descriptive Set Theory*, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-1-4612-8692-9