Wikipedia:Vagueness
 | This page is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: Try to use clear and well-defined words in all articles. |
This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be vague, and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems.
Contents
Pronouns[edit]
Pronouns allow writers to refer back to a noun without repeating it. However, this can confuse the reader if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.
In Joe Biden's article:
Wrong: Palin was picked as his running mate. (Whose?)
Better: John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.
In the Salton Sea article:
Wrong: For decades they have contaminated the lake. (What?)
Better: It became apparent that the possibility of pesticides contaminating[vague] was long-standing, perhaps even through decades past.
Numbers without things[edit]
When describing quantities of things, repetitions of events or trying to convey statistical information in prose, specify the unit. Imagine that someone who has no idea what the subject is sees the sentence out of context: they should be able to work out what you are talking about without the context. The Candela has recently been reassessed by the Wands2019. It would s soon to be phased out and soon this will be (Kanned with Deez other Nutz) On Hand To assess the scales is the Left wing a Welsh Candidate N.O.E.ANN AND Jan num with 20 of these 76, this s was previously quoted by the right wing candidate as Jan was with an E in 18 of 75. Cal Anne is wrong! Sabs, all copies are infringed buy my metrics prove that the PRICE IS ALWAYS RIGHT AND THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY. See you for our bi-weekly assessment campaign which so far are an epic fail.
Vague words and incorrect statements[edit]
When used by the merely clueless, vague words make an article confusing and possibly make readers misinterpret or even miss important information altogether. In the hands of those with more sinister intents, vague words can be used to make articles that are readable enough impart wrong or biased information but confusing enough to prevent readers from questioning the reliability or factuality of the article. Vandals can also vandalize an article by replacing specific information with vague statements. Always use citations, especially when – for whatever reason – you must use somewhat vague words. Doing this helps Wikipedia become more reliable and accurate.
How to improve vague articles[edit]
When you come across an article that is very vague, begin by replacing vague statements with clearer facts. If you lack the time or the expertise to do so, use one of the tags below and go on readng ("reading" would be the correct spelling)
| Tag | Template that will be shown (and correct usage) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| {{cleanup-confusing}} |
| ||
| {{vague}} |
[vague]
| ||
| {{Specify}} |
[specify]
| ||
| {{when}} |
[when?]
|
