Moment of inertia

Moment of inertia
Flywheels have large moments of inertia to smooth out mechanical motion. This example is in a Russian museum.
Common symbols	I
SI unit	kg m2
Other units	lbf·ft·s2
Extensive?	yes
Derivations from other quantities	$I={\frac {L}{\omega }}$
Dimension	M L2

Part of a series of articles about
Classical mechanics
${\vec {F}}=m{\vec {a}}$ Second law of motion
History Timeline
Branches Applied Celestial Continuum Dynamics Kinematics Kinetics Statics Statistical
Fundamentals Acceleration Angular momentum Couple D'Alembert's principle Energy kinetic potential Force Frame of reference Inertial frame of reference Impulse Inertia / Moment of inertia Mass Mechanical power Mechanical work Moment Momentum Space Speed Time Torque Velocity Virtual work
Formulations Newton's laws of motion Analytical mechanics Lagrangian mechanics Hamiltonian mechanics Routhian mechanics Hamilton–Jacobi equation Appell's equation of motion Udwadia–Kalaba equation Koopman–von Neumann mechanics
Core topics Damping (ratio) Displacement Equations of motion Euler's laws of motion Fictitious force Friction Harmonic oscillator Inertial / Non-inertial reference frame Mechanics of planar particle motion Motion (linear) Newton's law of universal gravitation Newton's laws of motion Relative velocity Rigid body dynamics Euler's equations Simple harmonic motion Vibration
Rotation Circular motion Rotating reference frame Centripetal force Centrifugal force reactive Coriolis force Pendulum Tangential speed Rotational speed Angular acceleration / displacement / frequency / velocity
Scientists Galileo Huygens Newton Kepler Horrocks Halley Euler d'Alembert Clairaut Lagrange Laplace Hamilton Poisson Daniel Bernoulli Johann Bernoulli Cauchy

Tightrope walkers use the moment of inertia of a long rod for balance as they walk the rope. Samuel Dixon crossing the Niagara River in 1890.

The moment of inertia, otherwise known as the angular mass or rotational inertia, of a rigid body is a tensor that determines the torque needed for a desired angular acceleration about a rotational axis; similar to how mass determines the force needed for a desired acceleration. It depends on the body's mass distribution and the axis chosen, with larger moments requiring more torque to change the body's rotation rate. It is an extensive (additive) property: for a point mass the moment of inertia is just the mass times the square of the perpendicular distance to the rotation axis. The moment of inertia of a rigid composite system is the sum of the moments of inertia of its component subsystems (all taken about the same axis). Its simplest definition is the second moment of mass with respect to distance from an axis. For bodies constrained to rotate in a plane, only their moment of inertia about an axis perpendicular to the plane, a scalar value, matters. For bodies free to rotate in three dimensions, their moments can be described by a symmetric 3 × 3 matrix, with a set of mutually perpendicular principal axes for which this matrix is diagonal and torques around the axes act independently of each other.

Introduction

When a body is free to rotate around an axis, torque must be applied to change its angular momentum. The amount of torque needed to cause any given angular acceleration (the rate of change in angular velocity) is proportional to the moment of inertia of the body. Moment of inertia may be expressed in units of kilogram meter squared (kg·m²) in SI units and pound-foot-second squared (lbf·ft·s²) in imperial or US units.

Moment of inertia plays the role in rotational kinetics that mass (inertia) plays in linear kinetics - both characterize the resistance of a body to changes in its motion. The moment of inertia depends on how mass is distributed around an axis of rotation, and will vary depending on the chosen axis. For a point-like mass, the moment of inertia about some axis is given by $mr^{2}$, where $r$ is the distance of the point from the axis, and $m$ is the mass. For an extended rigid body, the moment of inertia is just the sum of all the small pieces of mass multiplied by the square of their distances from the axis in question. For an extended body of a regular shape and uniform density, this summation sometimes produces a simple expression that depends on the dimensions, shape and total mass of the object.

In 1673 Christiaan Huygens introduced this parameter in his study of the oscillation of a body hanging from a pivot, known as a compound pendulum. The term moment of inertia was introduced by Leonhard Euler in his book Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum in 1765, and it is incorporated into Euler's second law.

The natural frequency of oscillation of a compound pendulum is obtained from the ratio of the torque imposed by gravity on the mass of the pendulum to the resistance to acceleration defined by the moment of inertia. Comparison of this natural frequency to that of a simple pendulum consisting of a single point of mass provides a mathematical formulation for moment of inertia of an extended body.

Moment of inertia also appears in momentum, kinetic energy, and in Newton's laws of motion for a rigid body as a physical parameter that combines its shape and mass. There is an interesting difference in the way moment of inertia appears in planar and spatial movement. Planar movement has a single scalar that defines the moment of inertia, while for spatial movement the same calculations yield a 3 × 3 matrix of moments of inertia, called the inertia matrix or inertia tensor.

The moment of inertia of a rotating flywheel is used in a machine to resist variations in applied torque to smooth its rotational output. The moment of inertia of an airplane about its longitudinal, horizontal and vertical axis determines how steering forces on the control surfaces of its wings, elevators and tail affect the plane in roll, pitch and yaw.

Definition

Spinning figure skaters can reduce their moment of inertia by pulling in their arms, allowing them to spin faster due to conservation of angular momentum.

Play media

Video of rotating chair experiment, illustrating moment of inertia. When the spinning professor pulls his arms, his moment of inertia decreases; to conserve angular momentum, his angular velocity increases.

Moment of inertia $I$ is defined as the ratio of the net angular momentum $L$ of a system to its angular velocity $\omega$ around a principal axis, that is

$I={\frac {L}{\omega }}.$

If the angular momentum of a system is constant, then as the moment of inertia gets smaller, the angular velocity must increase. This occurs when spinning figure skaters pull in their outstretched arms or divers curl their bodies into a tuck position during a dive, to spin faster.

If the shape of the body does not change, then its moment of inertia appears in Newton's law of motion as the ratio of an applied torque $\tau$ on a body to the angular acceleration $\alpha$ around a principal axis, that is

$\tau =I\alpha .$

For a simple pendulum, this definition yields a formula for the moment of inertia $I$ in terms of the mass $m$ of the pendulum and its distance $r$ from the pivot point as,

$I=mr^{2}.$

Thus, moment of inertia depends on both the mass $m$ of a body and its geometry, or shape, as defined by the distance $r$ to the axis of rotation.

This simple formula generalizes to define moment of inertia for an arbitrarily shaped body as the sum of all the elemental point masses $\mathrm {d} m$ each multiplied by the square of its perpendicular distance $r$ to an axis $k$.

In general, given an object of mass $m$, an effective radius $k$ can be defined for an axis through its center of mass, with such a value that its moment of inertia is

$I=mk^{2},$

where $k$ is known as the radius of gyration.

Examples

Simple pendulum

Moment of inertia can be measured using a simple pendulum, because it is the resistance to the rotation caused by gravity. Mathematically, the moment of inertia of the pendulum is the ratio of the torque due to gravity about the pivot of a pendulum to its angular acceleration about that pivot point. For a simple pendulum this is found to be the product of the mass of the particle $m$ with the square of its distance $r$ to the pivot, that is

$I=mr^{2}.$

This can be shown as follows: The force of gravity on the mass of a simple pendulum generates a torque ${\boldsymbol {\tau }}=\mathbf {r} \times \mathbf {F}$ around the axis perpendicular to the plane of the pendulum movement. Here $\mathbf {r}$ is the distance vector perpendicular to and from the force to the torque axis, and $\mathbf {F}$ is the net force on the mass. Associated with this torque is an angular acceleration, ${\boldsymbol {\alpha }}$, of the string and mass around this axis. Since the mass is constrained to a circle the tangential acceleration of the mass is ${\mathbf {a} }={\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\mathbf {r} }$. Since $F=ma$ the torque equation becomes:

${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\mathbf {r} \times \mathbf {F} =\mathbf {r} \times (m{\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times \mathbf {r} )\\&=m((\mathbf {r} \cdot \mathbf {r} ){\boldsymbol {\alpha }}-(\mathbf {r} \cdot {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})\mathbf {r} )\\&=mr^{2}{\boldsymbol {\alpha }}=I\alpha \mathbf {\hat {k}} ,\end{aligned}}$

where $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ is a unit vector perpendicular to the plane of the pendulum. (The second to last step uses the vector triple product expansion with the perpendicularity of ${\boldsymbol {\alpha }}$ and $\mathbf {r}$.) The quantity $I=mr^{2}$ is the moment of inertia of this single mass around the pivot point.

The quantity $I=mr^{2}$ also appears in the angular momentum of a simple pendulum, which is calculated from the velocity $\mathbf {v} ={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \mathbf {r}$ of the pendulum mass around the pivot, where ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ is the angular velocity of the mass about the pivot point. This angular momentum is given by

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {L} &=\mathbf {r} \times \mathbf {p} =\mathbf {r} \times (m{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \mathbf {r} )\\&=m((\mathbf {r} \cdot \mathbf {r} ){\boldsymbol {\omega }}-(\mathbf {r} \cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\mathbf {r} )\\&=mr^{2}{\boldsymbol {\omega }}=I\omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} ,\end{aligned}}$

using a similar derivation to the previous equation.

Similarly, the kinetic energy of the pendulum mass is defined by the velocity of the pendulum around the pivot to yield

$E_{\text{K}}={\frac {1}{2}}m\mathbf {v} \cdot \mathbf {v} ={\frac {1}{2}}\left(mr^{2}\right)\omega ^{2}={\frac {1}{2}}I\omega ^{2}.$

This shows that the quantity $I=mr^{2}$ is how mass combines with the shape of a body to define rotational inertia. The moment of inertia of an arbitrarily shaped body is the sum of the values $mr^{2}$ for all of the elements of mass in the body.

Compound pendulum

Pendulums used in Mendenhall gravimeter apparatus, from 1897 scientific journal. The portable gravimeter developed in 1890 by Thomas C. Mendenhall provided the most accurate relative measurements of the local gravitational field of the Earth.

A compound pendulum is a body formed from an assembly of particles of continuous shape that rotates rigidly around a pivot. Its moment of inertia is the sum of the moments of inertia of each of the particles that it is composed of. The natural frequency ($\omega _{\text{n}}$) of a compound pendulum depends on its moment of inertia, $I_{P}$,

$\omega _{\text{n}}={\sqrt {\frac {mgr}{I_{P}}}},$

where $m$ is the mass of the object, $g$ is local acceleration of gravity, and $r$ is the distance from the pivot point to the center of mass of the object. Measuring this frequency of oscillation over small angular displacements provides an effective way of measuring moment of inertia of a body.

Thus, to determine the moment of inertia of the body, simply suspend it from a convenient pivot point $P$ so that it swings freely in a plane perpendicular to the direction of the desired moment of inertia, then measure its natural frequency or period of oscillation ($t$), to obtain

$I_{P}={\frac {mgr}{\omega _{\text{n}}^{2}}}={\frac {mgrt^{2}}{4\pi ^{2}}},$

where $t$ is the period (duration) of oscillation (usually averaged over multiple periods).

The moment of inertia of the body about its center of mass, $I_{C}$, is then calculated using the parallel axis theorem to be

$I_{C}=I_{P}-mr^{2},$

where $m$ is the mass of the body and $r$ is the distance from the pivot point $P$ to the center of mass $C$.

Moment of inertia of a body is often defined in terms of its radius of gyration, which is the radius of a ring of equal mass around the center of mass of a body that has the same moment of inertia. The radius of gyration $k$ is calculated from the body's moment of inertia $I_{C}$ and mass $m$ as the length

$k={\sqrt {\frac {I_{C}}{m}}}.$

Center of oscillation

A simple pendulum that has the same natural frequency as a compound pendulum defines the length $L$ from the pivot to a point called the center of oscillation of the compound pendulum. This point also corresponds to the center of percussion. The length $L$ is determined from the formula,

$\omega _{\text{n}}={\sqrt {\frac {g}{L}}}={\sqrt {\frac {mgr}{I_{P}}}},$

or

$L={\frac {g}{\omega _{\text{n}}^{2}}}={\frac {I_{P}}{mr}}.$

The seconds pendulum, which provides the "tick" and "tock" of a grandfather clock, takes one second to swing from side-to-side. This is a period of two seconds, or a natural frequency of $\pi \ \mathrm {rad/s}$ for the pendulum. In this case, the distance to the center of oscillation, $L$, can be computed to be

$L={\frac {g}{\omega _{\text{n}}^{2}}}\approx {\frac {9.81\ \mathrm {m/s^{2}} }{(3.14\ \mathrm {rad/s} )^{2}}}\approx 0.99\ \mathrm {m} .$

Notice that the distance to the center of oscillation of the seconds pendulum must be adjusted to accommodate different values for the local acceleration of gravity. Kater's pendulum is a compound pendulum that uses this property to measure the local acceleration of gravity, and is called a gravimeter.

Measuring moment of inertia

The moment of inertia of a complex system such as a vehicle or airplane around its vertical axis can be measured by suspending the system from three points to form a trifilar pendulum. A trifilar pendulum is a platform supported by three wires designed to oscillate in torsion around its vertical centroidal axis. The period of oscillation of the trifilar pendulum yields the moment of inertia of the system.

Motion in a fixed plane

Point mass

Four objects with identical masses and radii racing down a plane while rolling without slipping.

From back to front:

•      spherical shell,
•      solid sphere,
•      cylindrical ring, and
•      solid cylinder.

The time for each object to reach the finishing line depends on their moment of inertia. (OGV version)

The moment of inertia about an axis of a body is calculated by summing $mr^{2}$ for every particle in the body, where $r$ is the perpendicular distance to the specified axis. To see how moment of inertia arises in the study of the movement of an extended body, it is convenient to consider a rigid assembly of point masses. (This equation can be used for axes that are not principal axes provided that it is understood that this does not fully describe the moment of inertia.)

Consider the kinetic energy of an assembly of $N$ masses $m_{i}$ that lie at the distances $r_{i}$ from the pivot point $P$, which is the nearest point on the axis of rotation. It is the sum of the kinetic energy of the individual masses,

$E_{\text{K}}=\sum _{i=1}^{N}{\frac {1}{2}}\,m_{i}\mathbf {v} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {v} _{i}=\sum _{i=1}^{N}{\frac {1}{2}}\,m_{i}\left(\omega r_{i}\right)^{2}={\frac {1}{2}}\,\omega ^{2}\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}r_{i}^{2}.$

This shows that the moment of inertia of the body is the sum of each of the $mr^{2}$ terms, that is

$I_{P}=\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}r_{i}^{2}.$

Thus, moment of inertia is a physical property that combines the mass and distribution of the particles around the rotation axis. Notice that rotation about different axes of the same body yield different moments of inertia.

The moment of inertia of a continuous body rotating about a specified axis is calculated in the same way, except with infinitely many point particles. Thus the limits of summation are removed, and the sum is written as follows:

$I_{P}=\sum _{i}m_{i}r_{i}^{2}$

Another expression replaces the summation with an integral,

$I_{P}=\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho \left(x,y,z\right)\left\|\mathbf {r} \right\|^{2}\mathrm {d} V$

Here, the function $\rho$ gives the mass density at each point $(x,y,z)$, $\mathbf {r}$ is a vector perpendicular to the axis of rotation and extending from a point on the rotation axis to a point $(x,y,z)$ in the solid, and the integration is evaluated over the volume $V$ of the body $Q$. The moment of inertia of a flat surface is similar with the mass density being replaced by its areal mass density with the integral evaluated over its area.

Note on second moment of area: The moment of inertia of a body moving in a plane and the second moment of area of a beam's cross-section are often confused. The moment of inertia of a body with the shape of the cross-section is the second moment of this area about the $z$-axis perpendicular to the cross-section, weighted by its density. This is also called the polar moment of the area, and is the sum of the second moments about the $x$- and $y$-axes. The stresses in a beam are calculated using the second moment of the cross-sectional area around either the $x$-axis or $y$-axis depending on the load.

Examples

Main article: List of moments of inertia

The moment of inertia of a compound pendulum constructed from a thin disc mounted at the end of a thin rod that oscillates around a pivot at the other end of the rod, begins with the calculation of the moment of inertia of the thin rod and thin disc about their respective centers of mass.

• The moment of inertia of a thin rod with constant cross-section $s$ and density $\rho$ and with length $\ell$ about a perpendicular axis through its center of mass is determined by integration. Align the $x$-axis with the rod and locate the origin its center of mass at the center of the rod, then

  $I_{C,{\text{rod}}}=\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho \,x^{2}\,\mathrm {d} V=\int _{-{\frac {\ell }{2}}}^{\frac {\ell }{2}}\rho \,x^{2}s\,\mathrm {d} x=\left.\rho s{\frac {x^{3}}{3}}\right|_{-{\frac {\ell }{2}}}^{\frac {\ell }{2}}={\frac {\rho s}{3}}\left({\frac {\ell ^{3}}{8}}+{\frac {\ell ^{3}}{8}}\right)={\frac {m\ell ^{2}}{12}},$

  where $m=\rho s\ell$ is the mass of the rod.
• The moment of inertia of a thin disc of constant thickness $s$, radius $R$, and density $\rho$ about an axis through its center and perpendicular to its face (parallel to its axis of rotational symmetry) is determined by integration. Align the $z$-axis with the axis of the disc and define a volume element as $\mathrm {d} V=sr\mathrm {d} r\mathrm {d} \theta$, then

  $I_{C,{\text{disc}}}=\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho \,r^{2}\,\mathrm {d} V=\int _{0}^{2\pi }\int _{0}^{R}\rho r^{2}sr\,\mathrm {d} r\,\mathrm {d} \theta =2\pi \rho s{\frac {R^{4}}{4}}={\frac {1}{2}}mR^{2},$

  where $m=\pi R^{2}\rho s$ is its mass.
• The moment of inertia of the compound pendulum is now obtained by adding the moment of inertia of the rod and the disc around the pivot point $P$ as,

  $I_{P}=I_{C,{\text{rod}}}+M_{\text{rod}}\left({\frac {L}{2}}\right)^{2}+I_{C,{\text{disc}}}+M_{\text{disc}}(L+R)^{2},$

  where $L$ is the length of the pendulum. Notice that the parallel axis theorem is used to shift the moment of inertia from the center of mass to the pivot point of the pendulum.

A list of moments of inertia formulas for standard body shapes provides a way to obtain the moment of inertia of a complex body as an assembly of simpler shaped bodies. The parallel axis theorem is used to shift the reference point of the individual bodies to the reference point of the assembly.

As one more example, consider the moment of inertia of a solid sphere of constant density about an axis through its center of mass. This is determined by summing the moments of inertia of the thin discs that form the sphere. If the surface of the ball is defined by the equation

$x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=R^{2},$

then the radius $r$ of the disc at the cross-section $z$ along the $z$-axis is

$r(z)^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}=R^{2}-z^{2}.$

Therefore, the moment of inertia of the ball is the sum of the moments of inertia of the discs along the $z$-axis,

${\begin{aligned}I_{C,{\text{ball}}}&=\int _{-R}^{R}{\frac {\pi \rho }{2}}r(z)^{4}\,\mathrm {d} z=\int _{-R}^{R}{\frac {\pi \rho }{2}}\left(R^{2}-z^{2}\right)^{2}\,\mathrm {d} z\\&=\left.{\frac {\pi \rho }{2}}\left(R^{4}z-{\frac {2}{3}}R^{2}z^{3}+{\frac {1}{5}}z^{5}\right)\right|_{-R}^{R}\\&=\pi \rho \left(1-{\frac {2}{3}}+{\frac {1}{5}}\right)R^{5}\\&={\frac {2}{5}}mR^{2},\end{aligned}}$

where $m={\frac {4}{3}}\pi R^{3}\rho$ is the mass of the sphere.

Rigid body

If a mechanical system is constrained to move parallel to a fixed plane, then the rotation of a body in the system occurs around an axis $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ perpendicular to this plane. In this case, the moment of inertia of the mass in this system is a scalar known as the polar moment of inertia. The definition of the polar moment of inertia can be obtained by considering momentum, kinetic energy and Newton's laws for the planar movement of a rigid system of particles.

If a system of $n$ particles, $P_{i},i=1,...,n$, are assembled into a rigid body, then the momentum of the system can be written in terms of positions relative to a reference point $\mathbf {R}$, and absolute velocities $\mathbf {v} _{i}$:

${\begin{aligned}\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}&=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R} ,\\\mathbf {v} _{i}&={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left(\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R} \right)+\mathbf {V} ={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} ,\end{aligned}}$

where ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ is the angular velocity of the system and $\mathbf {V}$ is the velocity of $\mathbf {R}$.

For planar movement the angular velocity vector is directed along the unit vector $\mathbf {k}$ which is perpendicular to the plane of movement. Introduce the unit vectors $\mathbf {e} _{i}$ from the reference point $\mathbf {R}$ to a point $\mathbf {r} _{i}$, and the unit vector $\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}=\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}$, so

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}&={\frac {\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}}{\Delta r_{i}}},\quad \mathbf {\hat {k}} ={\frac {\boldsymbol {\omega }}{\omega }},\quad \mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}=\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i},\\\mathbf {v} _{i}&={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} =\omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}+\mathbf {V} =\omega \,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}+\mathbf {V} \end{aligned}}$

This defines the relative position vector and the velocity vector for the rigid system of the particles moving in a plane.

Note on the cross product: When a body moves parallel to a ground plane, the trajectories of all the points in the body lie in planes parallel to this ground plane. This means that any rotation that the body undergoes must be around an axis perpendicular to this plane. Planar movement is often presented as projected onto this ground plane so that the axis of rotation appears as a point. In this case, the angular velocity and angular acceleration of the body are scalars and the fact that they are vectors along the rotation axis is ignored. This is usually preferred for introductions to the topic. But in the case of moment of inertia, the combination of mass and geometry benefits from the geometric properties of the cross product. For this reason, in this section on planar movement the angular velocity and accelerations of the body are vectors perpendicular to the ground plane, and the cross product operations are the same as used for the study of spatial rigid body movement.

Angular momentum

The angular momentum vector for the planar movement of a rigid system of particles is given by

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {L} &=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {v} _{i}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\times \left(\omega \,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}+\mathbf {V} \right)\\&=\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}^{2}\right)\omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} +\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\right)\times \mathbf {V} .\end{aligned}}$

Use the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ as the reference point so

${\begin{aligned}\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}&=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} ,\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}&=0,\end{aligned}}$

and define the moment of inertia relative to the center of mass $I_{\mathbf {C} }$ as

$I_{\mathbf {C} }=\sum _{i}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}^{2},$

then the equation for angular momentum simplifies to

$\mathbf {L} =I_{\mathbf {C} }\omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} .$

The moment of inertia $I_{\mathbf {C} }$ about an axis perpendicular to the movement of the rigid system and through the center of mass is known as the polar moment of inertia. Specifically, it is the second moment of mass with respect to the orthogonal distance from an axis (or pole).

For a given amount of angular momentum, a decrease in the moment of inertia results in an increase in the angular velocity. Figure skaters can change their moment of inertia by pulling in their arms. Thus, the angular velocity achieved by a skater with outstretched arms results in a greater angular velocity when the arms are pulled in, because of the reduced moment of inertia. A figure skater is not, however, a rigid body.

Kinetic energy

This 1906 rotary shear uses the moment of inertia of two flywheels to store kinetic energy which when released is used to cut metal stock (International Library of Technology, 1906).

The kinetic energy of a rigid system of particles moving in the plane is given by

${\begin{aligned}E_{\text{K}}&={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\mathbf {v} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {v} _{i},\\&={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left(\omega \,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}+\mathbf {V} \right)\cdot \left(\omega \,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}+\mathbf {V} \right),\\&={\frac {1}{2}}\omega ^{2}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}^{2}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}\right)+\omega \mathbf {V} \cdot \left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\right)\mathbf {V} \cdot \mathbf {V} .\end{aligned}}$

Let the reference point be the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ of the system so the second term becomes zero, and introduce the moment of inertia $I_{\mathbf {C} }$ so the kinetic energy is given by

$E_{\text{K}}={\frac {1}{2}}I_{\mathbf {C} }\omega ^{2}+{\frac {1}{2}}M\mathbf {V} \cdot \mathbf {V} .$

The moment of inertia $I_{\mathbf {C} }$ is the polar moment of inertia of the body.

Newton's laws

A 1920s John Deere tractor with the spoked flywheel on the engine. The large moment of inertia of the flywheel smooths the operation of the tractor

Newton's laws for a rigid system of $n$ particles, $P_{i},i=1,...,n$, can be written in terms of a resultant force and torque at a reference point $\mathbf {R}$, to yield

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {F} &=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\mathbf {A} _{i},\\{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times m_{i}\mathbf {A} _{i},\end{aligned}}$

where $\mathbf {r} _{i}$ denotes the trajectory of each particle.

The kinematics of a rigid body yields the formula for the acceleration of the particle $P_{i}$ in terms of the position $\mathbf {R}$ and acceleration $\mathbf {A}$ of the reference particle as well as the angular velocity vector ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ and angular acceleration vector ${\boldsymbol {\alpha }}$ of the rigid system of particles as,

$\mathbf {A} _{i}={\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {A} .$

For systems that are constrained to planar movement, the angular velocity and angular acceleration vectors are directed along $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ perpendicular to the plane of movement, which simplifies this acceleration equation. In this case, the acceleration vectors can be simplified by introducing the unit vectors $\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}$ from the reference point $\mathbf {R}$ to a point $\mathbf {r} _{i}$ and the unit vectors $\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}=\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}$, so

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {A} _{i}&=\alpha \mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}-\omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \omega \mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}+\mathbf {A} \\&=\alpha \Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}-\omega ^{2}\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}+\mathbf {A} .\end{aligned}}$

This yields the resultant torque on the system as

${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\times \left(\alpha \Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}-\omega ^{2}\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}+\mathbf {A} \right)\\&=\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}^{2}\right)\alpha \mathbf {\hat {k}} +\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta r_{i}\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\right)\times \mathbf {A} ,\end{aligned}}$

where $\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\times \mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}=\mathbf {0}$, and $\mathbf {\hat {e}} _{i}\times \mathbf {\hat {t}} _{i}=\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ is the unit vector perpendicular to the plane for all of the particles $P_{i}$.

Use the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ as the reference point and define the moment of inertia relative to the center of mass $I_{\mathbf {C} }$, then the equation for the resultant torque simplifies to

${\boldsymbol {\tau }}=I_{\mathbf {C} }\alpha \mathbf {\hat {k}} .$

Motion in space of a rigid body, and the inertia matrix

The scalar moments of inertia appear as elements in a matrix when a system of particles is assembled into a rigid body that moves in three-dimensional space. This inertia matrix appears in the calculation of the angular momentum, kinetic energy and resultant torque of the rigid system of particles.

For analysis of a spinning top, see Precession § Classical (Newtonian), and Euler's equations (rigid body dynamics).

Let the system of $n$ particles, $P_{i},i=1,...,n$ be located at the coordinates $\mathbf {r} _{i}$ with velocities $\mathbf {v} _{i}$ relative to a fixed reference frame. For a (possibly moving) reference point $\mathbf {R}$, the relative positions are

$\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R}$

and the (absolute) velocities are

$\mathbf {v} _{i}={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {R} }$

where ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ is the angular velocity of the system, and $\mathbf {V_{R}}$ is the velocity of $\mathbf {R}$.

Angular momentum

Note that the cross product can be equivalently written as matrix multiplication by combining the first operand and the operator into a, skew-symmetric, matrix, $\left[\mathbf {b} \right]$, constructed from the components of $\mathbf {b} =(b_{x},b_{y},b_{z})$:

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {b} \times \mathbf {y} &\equiv \left[\mathbf {b} \right]\mathbf {y} \\\left[\mathbf {b} \right]&\equiv {\begin{bmatrix}0&-b_{z}&b_{y}\\b_{z}&0&-b_{x}\\-b_{y}&b_{x}&0\end{bmatrix}}.\end{aligned}}$

The inertia matrix is constructed by considering the angular momentum, with the reference point $\mathbf {R}$ of the body chosen to be the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$:

${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {L} &=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {v} _{i}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {R} }\right)\\&=\left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \left(\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }}\right)\right)+\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\,\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {R} }\right),\end{aligned}}$

where the terms containing $\mathbf {V_{R}}$ ($=\mathbf {C}$) sum to zero by the definition of center of mass.

Then, the skew-symmetric matrix $[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}]$ obtained from the relative position vector $\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C}$, can be used to define,

$\mathbf {L} =\left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\omega }}=\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }{\boldsymbol {\omega }},$

where $\mathbf {I_{C}}$ defined by

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2},$

is the symmetric inertia matrix of the rigid system of particles measured relative to the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$.

Kinetic energy

The kinetic energy of a rigid system of particles can be formulated in terms of the center of mass and a matrix of mass moments of inertia of the system. Let the system of $n$ particles $P_{i},i=1,...,n$ be located at the coordinates $\mathbf {r} _{i}$ with velocities $\mathbf {v} _{i}$, then the kinetic energy is

$E_{\text{K}}={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\mathbf {v} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {v} _{i}={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\right)\cdot \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}+\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\right),$

where $\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C}$ is the position vector of a particle relative to the center of mass.

This equation expands to yield three terms

$E_{\text{K}}={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\cdot \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)+\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\cdot \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\cdot \mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\right).$

The second term in this equation is zero because $\mathbf {C}$ is the center of mass. Introduce the skew-symmetric matrix $[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}]$ so the kinetic energy becomes

${\begin{aligned}E_{\text{K}}&={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left(\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\right)\cdot \left(\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\right)\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\right)\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\cdot \mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\\&={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}^{\mathsf {T}}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{\mathsf {T}}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\right)\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\right)\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\cdot \mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\\&={\frac {1}{2}}{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\omega }}+{\frac {1}{2}}\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\right)\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }\cdot \mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }.\end{aligned}}$

Thus, the kinetic energy of the rigid system of particles is given by

$E_{\text{K}}={\frac {1}{2}}{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }{\boldsymbol {\omega }}+{\frac {1}{2}}M\mathbf {V} _{\mathbf {C} }^{2}.$

where $\mathbf {I_{C}}$ is the inertia matrix relative to the center of mass and $M$ is the total mass.

Resultant torque

The inertia matrix appears in the application of Newton's second law to a rigid assembly of particles. The resultant torque on this system is,

${\boldsymbol {\tau }}=\sum _{i=1}^{n}\left(\mathbf {r_{i}} -\mathbf {R} \right)\times m_{i}\mathbf {a} _{i},$

where $\mathbf {a} _{i}$ is the acceleration of the particle $P_{i}$. The kinematics of a rigid body yields the formula for the acceleration of the particle $P_{i}$ in terms of the position $\mathbf {R}$ and acceleration $\mathbf {A} _{\mathbf {R} }$ of the reference point, as well as the angular velocity vector ${\boldsymbol {\omega }}$ and angular acceleration vector ${\boldsymbol {\alpha }}$ of the rigid system as,

$\mathbf {a} _{i}={\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times \left(\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R} \right)+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left(\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R} \right)+\mathbf {A} _{\mathbf {R} }.$

Use the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ as the reference point, and introduce the skew-symmetric matrix $\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]=\left[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} \right]$ to represent the cross product $(\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} )\times$, to obtain

${\boldsymbol {\tau }}=\left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\alpha }}+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\omega }}$

The calculation uses the identity

$\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left(\left({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)=0,$

obtained from the Jacobi identity for the triple cross product as shown in the proof below:

Proof

${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}(\mathbf {r_{i}} -\mathbf {R} )\times (m_{i}\mathbf {a} _{i})\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times (m_{i}\mathbf {a} _{i})\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {a} _{i}]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times (\mathbf {a} _{{\text{tangential}},i}+\mathbf {a} _{{\text{centripetal}},i}+\mathbf {A} _{\mathbf {R} })]\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times (\mathbf {a} _{{\text{tangential}},i}+\mathbf {a} _{{\text{centripetal}},i}+0)]\\&\;\;\;\;\;\ldots \;\mathbf {R} {\text{ is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity but not accelerated, or }}\\&\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\text{the origin of the fixed (world) coordinate reference system is placed at the center of mass }}\mathbf {C} \\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {a} _{{\text{tangential}},i}+{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {a} _{{\text{centripetal}},i}]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product distributivity over addition}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \mathbf {v} _{{\text{tangential}},i})]\\{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))]\\\end{aligned}}$ Then, the following Jacobi identity is used on the last term: ${\begin{aligned}0&={\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\\&={\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times -({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product anticommutativity}}\\&={\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+-[({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\&={\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+-[0]\;\ldots {\text{ self cross-product}}\\0&={\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\end{aligned}}$ The result of applying Jacobi identity can then be continued as follows: ${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))&=-[{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times (({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})]\\&=-[({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))]\;\ldots {\text{ vector triple product}}\\&=-[({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }}))]\;\ldots {\text{ scalar triple product}}\\&=-[({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot (0))]\;\ldots {\text{ self cross-product}}\\&=-[({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})]\\&=-[{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\&={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times -({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))&={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times -({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }}))\;\ldots {\text{ dot-product commutativity}}\\\end{aligned}}$ The final result can then be substituted to the main proof as follows: ${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}))]\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times -({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }}))]\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{0-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{[{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})]-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\;\ldots \;{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})=0\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{[{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})]-{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\}]\;\ldots {\text{ addition associativity}}\\\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\quad \quad &=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}-{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product distributivity over addition}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}-({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}-({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})(0)]\;\ldots {\text{ self cross-product}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\omega }}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})-{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\alpha }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i})\}]\;\ldots {\text{ vector triple product}}\\&=\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times -({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times -({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product anticommutativity}}\\&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product scalar multiplication}}\\&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})]+-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \{{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})\}]\;\ldots {\text{ summation distributivity}}\\{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})]+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times -\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})]\;\ldots \;{\boldsymbol {\omega }}{\text{ is not characteristic of particle }}P_{i}\end{aligned}}$ Notice that for any vector $\mathbf {u} \,$, the following holds: ${\begin{aligned}-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {u} )]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left({\begin{bmatrix}0&-\Delta r_{3,i}&\Delta r_{2,i}\\\Delta r_{3,i}&0&-\Delta r_{1,i}\\-\Delta r_{2,i}&\Delta r_{1,i}&0\end{bmatrix}}\left({\begin{bmatrix}0&-\Delta r_{3,i}&\Delta r_{2,i}\\\Delta r_{3,i}&0&-\Delta r_{1,i}\\-\Delta r_{2,i}&\Delta r_{1,i}&0\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}u_{1}\\u_{2}\\u_{3}\end{bmatrix}}\right)\right)\;\ldots {\text{ cross-product as matrix multiplication}}\\[6pt]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left({\begin{bmatrix}0&-\Delta r_{3,i}&\Delta r_{2,i}\\\Delta r_{3,i}&0&-\Delta r_{1,i}\\-\Delta r_{2,i}&\Delta r_{1,i}&0\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}-\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{3}\\+\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{1}-\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{3}\\-\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{2}\end{bmatrix}}\right)\\[6pt]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}{\begin{bmatrix}-\Delta r_{3,i}(+\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{1}-\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{3})+\Delta r_{2,i}(-\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{2})\\+\Delta r_{3,i}(-\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{3})-\Delta r_{1,i}(-\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{2})\\-\Delta r_{2,i}(-\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{3})+\Delta r_{1,i}(+\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{1}-\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{3})\end{bmatrix}}\\[6pt]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}{\begin{bmatrix}-\Delta r_{3,i}^{2}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{3}-\Delta r_{2,i}^{2}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{2}\\-\Delta r_{3,i}^{2}\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{3}+\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{1}-\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}\,u_{2}\\+\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{2}-\Delta r_{2,i}^{2}\,u_{3}+\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{1}-\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}\,u_{3}\end{bmatrix}}\\[6pt]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}{\begin{bmatrix}-(\Delta r_{2,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{3,i}^{2})\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{3}\\+\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{1}-(\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{3,i}^{2})\,u_{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\,u_{3}\\+\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{1,i}\,u_{1}+\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{2,i}\,u_{2}-(\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}^{2})\,u_{3}\end{bmatrix}}\\[6pt]&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}{\begin{bmatrix}-(\Delta r_{2,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{3,i}^{2})&\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{2,i}&\Delta r_{1,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\\\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{1,i}&-(\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{3,i}^{2})&\Delta r_{2,i}\Delta r_{3,i}\\\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{1,i}&\Delta r_{3,i}\Delta r_{2,i}&-(\Delta r_{1,i}^{2}+\Delta r_{2,i}^{2})\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}u_{1}\\u_{2}\\u_{3}\end{bmatrix}}\\&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\Delta r_{i}]^{2}\mathbf {u} \\[6pt]-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {u} )]&=\left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\Delta r_{i}]^{2}\right)\mathbf {u} \;\ldots \;\mathbf {u} {\text{ is not characteristic of }}P_{i}\end{aligned}}$ Finally, the result is used to complete the main proof as follows: ${\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {\tau }}&=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\alpha }})]+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times -\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}{\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times ({\boldsymbol {\Delta }}\mathbf {r} _{i}\times {\boldsymbol {\omega }})]\\&=\left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\Delta r_{i}]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\alpha }}+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \left(-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\Delta r_{i}]^{2}\right){\boldsymbol {\omega }}\end{aligned}}$

Thus, the resultant torque on the rigid system of particles is given by

${\boldsymbol {\tau }}=\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }{\boldsymbol {\alpha }}+{\boldsymbol {\omega }}\times \mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }{\boldsymbol {\omega }},$

where $\mathbf {I_{C}}$ is the inertia matrix relative to the center of mass.

Parallel axis theorem

Main article: Parallel axis theorem

The inertia matrix of a body depends on the choice of the reference point. There is a useful relationship between the inertia matrix relative to the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ and the inertia matrix relative to another point $\mathbf {R}$. This relationship is called the parallel axis theorem.

Consider the inertia matrix $\mathbf {I_{R}}$ obtained for a rigid system of particles measured relative to a reference point $\mathbf {R}$, given by

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\left[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R} \right]^{2}.$

Let $\mathbf {C}$ be the center of mass of the rigid system, then

$\mathbf {R} =(\mathbf {R} -\mathbf {C} )+\mathbf {C} =\mathbf {d} +\mathbf {C} ,$

where $\mathbf {d}$ is the vector from the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ to the reference point $\mathbf {R}$. Use this equation to compute the inertia matrix,

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\left(\mathbf {C} +\mathbf {d} \right)]^{2}=-\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\left(\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} \right)-\mathbf {d} ]^{2}.$

Distribute over the cross product to obtain

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }=-\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} ]^{2}\right)+\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} ]\right)[\mathbf {d} ]+[\mathbf {d} ]\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}[\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {C} ]\right)-\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}m_{i}\right)[\mathbf {d} ]^{2}.$

The first term is the inertia matrix $\mathbf {I_{C}}$ relative to the center of mass. The second and third terms are zero by definition of the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$. And the last term is the total mass of the system multiplied by the square of the skew-symmetric matrix $[\mathbf {d} ]$ constructed from $\mathbf {d}$.

The result is the parallel axis theorem,

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }=\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }-M[\mathbf {d} ]^{2},$

where $\mathbf {d}$ is the vector from the center of mass $\mathbf {C}$ to the reference point $\mathbf {R}$.

Note on the minus sign: By using the skew symmetric matrix of position vectors relative to the reference point, the inertia matrix of each particle has the form $-m\left[\mathbf {r} \right]^{2}$, which is similar to the $mr^{2}$ that appears in planar movement. However, to make this to work out correctly a minus sign is needed. This minus sign can be absorbed into the term $m\left[\mathbf {r} \right]^{\mathsf {T}}\left[\mathbf {r} \right]$, if desired, by using the skew-symmetry property of $[\mathbf {r} ]$.

Scalar moment of inertia in a plane

The scalar moment of inertia, $I_{L}$, of a body about a specified axis whose direction is specified by the unit vector $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ and passes through the body at a point $\mathbf {R}$ is as follows:

$I_{L}=\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \left(-\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right)\mathbf {\hat {k}} =\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }\mathbf {\hat {k}} =\mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}}\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }\mathbf {\hat {k}} ,$

where $\mathbf {I_{R}}$ is the moment of inertia matrix of the system relative to the reference point $\mathbf {R}$, and $[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}]$ is the skew symmetric matrix obtained from the vector $\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}=\mathbf {r} _{i}-\mathbf {R}$.

This is derived as follows. Let a rigid assembly of $n$ particles, $P_{i},i=1,...,n$, have coordinates $\mathbf {r} _{i}$. Choose $\mathbf {R}$ as a reference point and compute the moment of inertia around a line L defined by the unit vector $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ through the reference point $\mathbf {R}$, $\mathbf {L} (t)=\mathbf {R} +t\mathbf {\hat {k}}$. The perpendicular vector from this line to the particle $P_{i}$ is obtained from $\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}$ by removing the component that projects onto $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$.

$\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}^{\perp }=\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}-\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\mathbf {\hat {k}} =\left(\mathbf {E} -\mathbf {\hat {k}} \mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}}\right)\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i},$

where $\mathbf {E}$ is the identity matrix, so as to avoid confusion with the inertia matrix, and $\mathbf {\hat {k}} \mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}}$ is the outer product matrix formed from the unit vector $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ along the line $L$.

To relate this scalar moment of inertia to the inertia matrix of the body, introduce the skew-symmetric matrix $\left[\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right]$ such that $\left[\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right]\mathbf {y} =\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \mathbf {y}$, then we have the identity

$-\left[\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right]^{2}\equiv \left|\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right|^{2}\left(\mathbf {E} -\mathbf {\hat {k}} \mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}}\right)=\mathbf {E} -\mathbf {\hat {k}} \mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}},$

noting that $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ is a unit vector.

The magnitude squared of the perpendicular vector is

${\begin{aligned}\left|\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}^{\perp }\right|^{2}&=\left(-\left[\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right]^{2}\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\cdot \left(-\left[\mathbf {\hat {k}} \right]^{2}\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\\&=\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\cdot \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\end{aligned}}$

The simplification of this equation uses the triple scalar product identity

$\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\cdot \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\equiv \left(\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\times \mathbf {\hat {k}} \right)\cdot \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right),$

where the dot and the cross products have been interchanged. Exchanging products, and simplifying by noting that $\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}$ and $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ are orthogonal:

${\begin{aligned}&\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\cdot \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\\={}&\left(\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\right)\times \mathbf {\hat {k}} \right)\cdot \left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\\={}&\left(\mathbf {\hat {k}} \times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right)\cdot \left(-\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {\hat {k}} \right)\\={}&-\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \left(\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\times \mathbf {\hat {k}} \right)\\={}&-\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\mathbf {\hat {k}} .\end{aligned}}$

Thus, the moment of inertia around the line $L$ through $\mathbf {R}$ in the direction $\mathbf {\hat {k}}$ is obtained from the calculation

${\begin{aligned}I_{L}&=\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}\left|\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}^{\perp }\right|^{2}\\&=-\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\mathbf {\hat {k}} =\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \left(-\sum _{i=1}^{N}m_{i}\left[\Delta \mathbf {r} _{i}\right]^{2}\right)\mathbf {\hat {k}} \\&=\mathbf {\hat {k}} \cdot \mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }\mathbf {\hat {k}} =\mathbf {\hat {k}} ^{\mathsf {T}}\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {R} }\mathbf {\hat {k}} ,\end{aligned}}$

where $\mathbf {I_{R}}$ is the moment of inertia matrix of the system relative to the reference point $\mathbf {R}$.

This shows that the inertia matrix can be used to calculate the moment of inertia of a body around any specified rotation axis in the body.

Inertia tensor

The inertia matrix is often described as the inertia tensor, which consists of the same moments of inertia and products of inertia about the three coordinate axes. The inertia tensor is constructed from the nine component tensors, (the symbol $\otimes$ is the tensor product)

$\mathbf {e} _{i}\otimes \mathbf {e} _{j},\quad i,j=1,2,3,$

where $\mathbf {e} _{i},i=1,2,3$ are the three orthogonal unit vectors defining the inertial frame in which the body moves. Using this basis the inertia tensor is given by

$\mathbf {I} =\sum _{i=1}^{3}\sum _{j=1}^{3}I_{ij}\mathbf {e} _{i}\otimes \mathbf {e} _{j}.$

This tensor is of degree two because the component tensors are each constructed from two basis vectors. In this form the inertia tensor is also called the inertia binor.

For a rigid system of particles $P_{k},k=1,...,N$ each of mass $m_{k}$ with position coordinates $\mathbf {r} _{k}=(x_{k},y_{k},z_{k})$, the inertia tensor is given by

$\mathbf {I} =\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}\left(\left(\mathbf {r} _{k}\cdot \mathbf {r} _{k}\right)\mathbf {E} -\mathbf {r} _{k}\otimes \mathbf {r} _{k}\right),$

where $\mathbf {E}$ is the identity tensor

$\mathbf {E} =\mathbf {e} _{1}\otimes \mathbf {e} _{1}+\mathbf {e} _{2}\otimes \mathbf {e} _{2}+\mathbf {e} _{3}\otimes \mathbf {e} _{3}.$

In this case, the components of the inertia tensor are given by

${\begin{aligned}I_{11}=I_{xx}&=\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}\left(y_{k}^{2}+z_{k}^{2}\right),\\I_{22}=I_{yy}&=\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}\left(x_{k}^{2}+z_{k}^{2}\right),\\I_{33}=I_{zz}&=\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}\left(x_{k}^{2}+y_{k}^{2}\right),\\I_{12}=I_{21}=I_{xy}&=-\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}x_{k}y_{k},\\I_{13}=I_{31}=I_{xz}&=-\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}x_{k}z_{k},\\I_{23}=I_{32}=I_{yz}&=-\sum _{k=1}^{N}m_{k}y_{k}z_{k}.\end{aligned}}$

The inertia tensor for a continuous body is given by

$\mathbf {I} =\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho (\mathbf {r} )\left(\left(\mathbf {r} \cdot \mathbf {r} \right)\mathbf {E} -\mathbf {r} \otimes \mathbf {r} \right)\,\mathrm {d} V,$

where $\mathbf {r}$ defines the coordinates of a point in the body and $\rho (\mathbf {r} )$ is the mass density at that point. The integral is taken over the volume $V$ of the body. The inertia tensor is symmetric because $I_{ij}=I_{ji}$.

Alternatively it can also be written in terms of the angular momentum operator $[\mathbf {r} ]\mathbf {x} =\mathbf {r} \times \mathbf {x}$:

$\mathbf {I} =\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho (\mathbf {r} )[\mathbf {r} ]^{T}[\mathbf {r} ]\,\mathrm {d} V=-\iiint \limits _{Q}\rho (\mathbf {r} )[\mathbf {r} ]^{2}\,\mathrm {d} V$

The inertia tensor can be used in the same way as the inertia matrix to compute the scalar moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis in the direction $\mathbf {n}$,

$I_{n}=\mathbf {n} \cdot \mathbf {I} \cdot \mathbf {n} ,$

where the dot product is taken with the corresponding elements in the component tensors. A product of inertia term such as $I_{12}$ is obtained by the computation

$I_{12}=\mathbf {e} _{1}\cdot \mathbf {I} \cdot \mathbf {e} _{2},$

and can be interpreted as the moment of inertia around the $x$-axis when the object rotates around the $y$-axis.

The components of tensors of degree two can be assembled into a matrix. For the inertia tensor this matrix is given by,

$\mathbf {I} ={\begin{bmatrix}I_{11}&I_{12}&I_{13}\\I_{21}&I_{22}&I_{23}\\I_{31}&I_{32}&I_{33}\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}I_{xx}&I_{xy}&I_{xz}\\I_{yx}&I_{yy}&I_{yz}\\I_{zx}&I_{zy}&I_{zz}\end{bmatrix}}.$

It is common in rigid body mechanics to use notation that explicitly identifies the $x$, $y$, and $z$-axes, such as $I_{xx}$ and $I_{xy}$, for the components of the inertia tensor.

Inertia matrix in different reference frames

The use of the inertia matrix in Newton's second law assumes its components are computed relative to axes parallel to the inertial frame and not relative to a body-fixed reference frame. This means that as the body moves the components of the inertia matrix change with time. In contrast, the components of the inertia matrix measured in a body-fixed frame are constant.

Body frame

Let the body frame inertia matrix relative to the center of mass be denoted $\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }^{B}$, and define the orientation of the body frame relative to the inertial frame by the rotation matrix $\mathbf {A}$, such that,

$\mathbf {x} =\mathbf {A} \mathbf {y} ,$

where vectors $\mathbf {y}$ in the body fixed coordinate frame have coordinates $\mathbf {x}$ in the inertial frame. Then, the inertia matrix of the body measured in the inertial frame is given by

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }=\mathbf {A} \mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }^{B}\mathbf {A} ^{\mathsf {T}}.$

Notice that $\mathbf {A}$ changes as the body moves, while $\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }^{B}$ remains constant.

Principal axes

Measured in the body frame the inertia matrix is a constant real symmetric matrix. A real symmetric matrix has the eigendecomposition into the product of a rotation matrix $\mathbf {Q}$ and a diagonal matrix ${\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}$, given by

$\mathbf {I} _{\mathbf {C} }^{B}=\mathbf {Q} {\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}\mathbf {Q} ^{\mathsf {T}},$

where

${\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}={\begin{bmatrix}I_{1}&0&0\\0&I_{2}&0\\0&0&I_{3}\end{bmatrix}}.$

The columns of the rotation matrix $\mathbf {Q}$ define the directions of the principal axes of the body, and the constants $I_{1}$, $I_{2}$, and $I_{3}$ are called the principal moments of inertia. This result was first shown by J. J. Sylvester (1852), and is a form of Sylvester's law of inertia.

For bodies with constant density an axis of rotational symmetry is a principal axis.

Ellipsoid

An ellipsoid with the semi-principal diameters labelled $a$, $b$, and $c$.

The moment of inertia matrix in body-frame coordinates is a quadratic form that defines a surface in the body called Poinsot's ellipsoid. Let ${\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}$ be the inertia matrix relative to the center of mass aligned with the principal axes, then the surface

$\mathbf {x} ^{\mathsf {T}}{\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}\mathbf {x} =1,$

or

$I_{1}x^{2}+I_{2}y^{2}+I_{3}z^{2}=1,$

defines an ellipsoid in the body frame. Write this equation in the form,

$\left({\frac {x}{1/{\sqrt {I_{1}}}}}\right)^{2}+\left({\frac {y}{1/{\sqrt {I_{2}}}}}\right)^{2}+\left({\frac {z}{1/{\sqrt {I_{3}}}}}\right)^{2}=1,$

to see that the semi-principal diameters of this ellipsoid are given by

$a={\frac {1}{\sqrt {I_{1}}}},\quad b={\frac {1}{\sqrt {I_{2}}}},\quad c={\frac {1}{\sqrt {I_{3}}}}.$

Let a point $\mathbf {x}$ on this ellipsoid be defined in terms of its magnitude and direction, $\mathbf {x} =||\mathbf {x} ||\mathbf {n}$, where $\mathbf {n}$ is a unit vector. Then the relationship presented above, between the inertia matrix and the scalar moment of inertia $I_{\mathbf {n} }$ around an axis in the direction $\mathbf {n}$, yields

$\mathbf {x} ^{\mathsf {T}}{\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}\mathbf {x} =||\mathbf {x} ||^{2}\mathbf {n} ^{\mathsf {T}}{\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}\mathbf {n} =||\mathbf {x} ||^{2}I_{\mathbf {n} }=1.$

Thus, the magnitude of a point $\mathbf {x}$ in the direction $\mathbf {n}$ on the inertia ellipsoid is

$||\mathbf {x} ||={\frac {1}{\sqrt {I_{\mathbf {n} }}}}.$

See also

• Central moment
• List of moments of inertia
• Rotational energy

External links

• Angular momentum and rigid-body rotation in two and three dimensions
• Lecture notes on rigid-body rotation and moments of inertia
• The moment of inertia tensor
• An introductory lesson on moment of inertia: keeping a vertical pole not falling down (Java simulation)
• Tutorial on finding moments of inertia, with problems and solutions on various basic shapes
• Notes on mechanics of manipulation: the angular inertia tensor