Front vowel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IPA: Vowels
Front Central Back
Close
Near-close
Close-mid
Mid
Open-mid
Near-open
Open

Paired vowels are: unrounded  rounded

A front vowel is any in a class of vowel sound used in some spoken languages, its defining characteristic being that the highest point of the tongue is positioned relatively in front in the mouth without creating a constriction that would make it a consonant. Front vowels are sometimes also called bright vowels because they are perceived as sounding brighter than the back vowels.[1]

Near-front vowels are essentially a type of front vowel; no language is known to contrast front and near-front vowels based on backness alone.

Rounded front vowels are typically centralized, that is, near-front in their articulation. This is one reason they are written to the right of unrounded front vowels in the IPA vowel chart.

Partial list[edit]

The front vowels that have dedicated symbols in the International Phonetic Alphabet are:

There also are front vowels without dedicated symbols in the IPA:

As above, other front vowels can be indicated with diacritics of relative articulation applied to letters for neighboring vowels, such as ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩ or ⟨ɪ̟⟩ for a near-close front unrounded vowel.

Articulatory front vowels[edit]

Front vowels are one of three articulatory dimensions of vowel space

In articulation, front vowels contrast with raised vowels and retracted vowels. In this conception, front vowels are a broader category than those listed in the IPA chart, including [ɪ ʏ], [ɨ ʉ], and, marginally, mid-central vowels. Raised or retracted vowels may be fronted by certain consonants, such as palatals and in some languages pharyngeals. For example, /a/ may be fronted to [æ] next to /j/ or /ħ/.[2]

Effect on preceding consonant[edit]

In the history of many languages, for example French and Japanese, front vowels have altered preceding velar or alveolar consonants, bringing their place of articulation towards palatal or postalveolar. This change can be allophonic variation, or it can have become phonemic.

This historical palatalization is reflected in the orthographies of several European languages, including the ⟨c⟩ and ⟨g⟩ of almost all Romance languages, the ⟨k⟩ and ⟨g⟩ in Norwegian, Swedish, Faroese and Icelandic, and the ⟨κ⟩, ⟨γ⟩ and ⟨χ⟩ in Greek. English follows the French pattern, but without as much regularity. However, for native or early borrowed words affected by palatalization, English has generally altered the spelling after the pronunciation (Examples include cheap, church, cheese, churn from /*k/, and yell, yarn, yearn, yeast from /*ɡ/.)

Before back vowel: hard Before front vowel: soft
English ⟨C⟩ call /kɔːl/ cell /sɛl/
English ⟨G⟩ gall /ɡɔːl/ gel /ɛl/
French ⟨C⟩ Calais [kalɛ] (About this soundlisten) cela [səla] (About this soundlisten)
French ⟨G⟩ gare [ɡaʁ] (About this soundlisten) gel [ʒɛl] (About this soundlisten)
Greek ⟨Γ⟩ γάιδαρος [ˈɣai̯ðaros] (About this soundlisten) γη [ʝi] (About this soundlisten)
Greek ⟨Χ⟩ Χανιά [xaˈɲa] (About this soundlisten) χαίρετε [ˈçerete] (About this soundlisten)
Italian ⟨C⟩ caro [ˈkaːro] (About this soundlisten) ciao [ˈtʃaːo] (About this soundlisten)
Italian ⟨G⟩ gatto [ˈɡatːo] (About this soundlisten) gente [ˈdʒɛnte] (About this soundlisten)
Italian ⟨SC⟩ pesca [ˈpeska] (About this soundlisten) pesce [ˈpeʃːe] (About this soundlisten)
Japanese ⟨S⟩ sūdoku [sɯꜜːdokɯ] (About this soundlisten) shiitake [ɕiꜜːtake] (About this soundlisten)[a]
Japanese ⟨T⟩ atatakai [atatakaꜜi] (About this soundlisten) dotchi [dotꜜtɕi] (About this soundlisten)[a]
Swedish ⟨K⟩ karta [²kɑːʈa] (About this soundlisten) kär [ɕæːr] (About this soundlisten)
Swedish ⟨G⟩ god [ɡuːd] (About this soundlisten) göra [²jœːra] (About this soundlisten)
Swedish ⟨SK⟩ skal [skɑːl] (About this soundlisten) skälla [²ɧɛlːa] (About this soundlisten)
  1. ^ a b Palatalization of /si/, /ti/ etc. is shown in spelling in Hepburn romanization.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Tsur, Reuven (February 1992). The Poetic Mode of Speech Perception. Duke University Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-8223-1170-4.
  2. ^ Scott Moisik, Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins, & John H. Esling (2012) "The Epilaryngeal Articulator: A New Conceptual Tool for Understanding Lingual-Laryngeal Contrasts"